![]() ![]() Such rhetoric reinforced sexist ideology by positing in an inverted form the notion of a basic conflict between the sexes, the implication being that the empowerment of women would necessarily be at the expense of men. (p. argued were all-powerful, misogynist, oppressor – the enemy. Summary: This book established bell hooks as one of feminisms most vital and influential voices. Feminist Theory established bell hooks as one of international feminisms most challenging and influential voices. By making women’s liberation synonymous with women gaining social equality with men, liberal feminists effectively created a situation in which they, not men, designated the feminist movement, ‘women’s work.’ Even as they were attacking sex role divisions of labor, the institutionalized sexism which assigns unpaid, devalued, ‘dirty’ work to women, they were assigning to women yet another sex role task: making feminist revolution. ![]() This lack of participation is not solely a consequence of anti-feminism. A sweeping examination of the core issues of sexual politics, bell hooks’ new book Feminist Theory: from margin to center argues that the contemporary feminist movement must establish a new direction for the 1980s. So far, contemporary feminist movement has been primarily generated by the efforts of women – men have rarely participated. Defining feminism as “a movement to end sexist oppression,” she wrote, “enables women and men, girls and boys, to participate equally in revolutionary struggle” (p. In her 1984 book Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center, bell hooks (1984) explained that feminist activism shouldn’t be designated solely “women’s work” (p. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |